Is wedgwoodinsurance.com agent ready?
wedgwoodinsurance.com is partly agent ready: it scores 58/100 (grade C) on the w2agent rubric. Weakest areas: Agent Auth (10), Agent Protocols (29).
How wedgwoodinsurance.com compares
Better than 76% of measured sites
vs other WordPress sites: better than 73% of 167 WordPress sites
WordPress median: 53/100
Among 1299 websites measured under rubric v3.0
Changed since last check
+38 points since the previous check (2026-09-15)
Fixed: FAQ content, Answer-first content, OpenGraph meta tags, No error status codes, Canonical URLs, Content length, XML sitemap exists, llms.txt exists, Freshness signals, Schema.org JSON-LD present, Lists and tables for structured info, Reachable as Google-Agent, Reachable as ChatGPT-User
Regressed: Response time, Token efficiency (HTML-to-text ratio), Heading hierarchy
Changed: Public API surface (fail → partial), Semantic HTML elements (fail → partial), Appropriate Schema.org type (fail → partial), Author attribution (fail → partial)
Files added: sitemap.xml, llms.txt
Category scores
Agent protocol panel
- A2A agent cardNot found
- OAuth discoveryNot found
- MCP discoveryNot found
- llms.txt validityPresent
Check results
Bot Accessibility
- ✓No error status codespass
- ✗Response timefail
- ✓XML sitemap existspass
- ✓AI agent accesspass
- ?Edge treatment of agent user-agentstracked, not scorederror
- ✓robots.txt existspass
- ✗Content negotiation (Markdown)fail
- —Declared AI usage preferencestracked, not scoredskip
Structured Data
- ✓OpenGraph meta tagspass
- ~Semantic HTML elementspartial
- ~Appropriate Schema.org typepartial
- ✓JSON-LD validpass
- ~Heading hierarchypartial
- ✓Schema.org JSON-LD presentpass
- ✗Schema.org completenessfail
Content Quality
- ✓FAQ contentpass
- ✓Answer-first contentpass
- ✓Content lengthpass
- ~Token efficiency (HTML-to-text ratio)partial
- ✓Freshness signalspass
- ~Author attributionpartial
- ✓Citation readinesspass
- ✓Lists and tables for structured infopass
Agent Discovery
- ✓llms.txt follows specpass
- ✓llms.txt existspass
- —MCP server cardtracked, not scoredskip
- ✗Markdown alternate linksfail
- ✗/.well-known/agent-card.jsonfail
- ✓llms.txt links resolvepass
Agent Protocols
- ✗Discoverable API endpointsfail
- ✗MCP endpointfail
- ✗Action schemasfail
- —/.well-known/ucpskip
- ✓Structured formspass
- —WebMCP imperative APItracked, not scoredskip
- —WebMCP declarative APItracked, not scoredskip
- ✓Reachable as Google-Agentpass
- ✓Reachable as ChatGPT-Userpass
- ✗Reachable as Perplexity-Userfail
Agent Auth
- —MCP authorization (401 challenge → protected resource metadata)skip
- —PKCE S256 supportskip
- ~Public API surfacepartial
- —Client ID Metadata Documents (bonus)skip
- ✗OpenAPI specificationfail
- —Agent/bot auth documentationskip
- ✗OAuth discovery chain (RFC 9728 → RFC 8414)fail
- ✗Developer portalfail
- —Scoped API permissionsskip
- ✗API catalog (RFC 9727)fail
- —Agent operator signing directorytracked, not scoredskip
Technical
- ✓HTTPSpass
- ✓UTF-8 charsetpass
- ✓Canonical URLspass
- ✓Mobile viewportpass
- ✓Content accessible without JSpass
- ~Security headerspartial
Other
- ✓wp-page-builder-souppass
- ✗wp-rest-api-accessiblefail
- ✓wp-security-blocking-botspass
- ✓wp-robots-default-blockingpass
- ✓local-business-hours-jsonldpass
- ✓local-business-nap-structuredpass
- —local-business-booking-accessibleskip
Score history
- 58/100 · rubric v3.0
- 20/100 · rubric v3.0
- 54/100 · rubric v2.0
- 54/100 · rubric v2.0
- 54/100 · rubric v2.0
- 53/100 · rubric v2.0